It is either cancellation or bad journalism
Imagine this.
In a turbulent highly politicised Britain where political news and commentary is the top viewed content.
A new party emerges. Anti-establishment party. And manages to get 30k members in just over 2 months. Something unheard of in modern politics.
Two news channels who pose themselves as anti-establishment media and pro free speech never invite the leader of this new party during this period or after this unprecedented feat.
It just so happens that these two channels are filled with a so-called insurgent political party that has major disagreements with the leader of this new party.
Mere coincidence I guess. Somehow I don't think so.
There are barely any journalists left. Just propagandists for one party or another who posit themselves as not taking sides as long as they can use it to make their side look good.
There is absolutely no way a good journalist would not have been interested in the rise and success of this new party at all, especially in these times, regardless of their personal views.
You do not defeat a corrupt establishment by trying to create a new establishment which acts much alike the one before and uses their tactics. Everything that I have seen from Reform, it's members, and supporters tells of the same thing we are fighting against but maybe just slightly better.
If you have the strength of your convictions then fight on them, and not by silencing others.
The response of these two news channel has been telling Ben Habib that this isn’t true and he somehow is paranoid instead. There is no ban. Okay, there is no ban on him, then why have you gone out of your way not to have him on given the gravity of what has been achieved? So, you are admitting that you are a bad journalist instead of a propagandist? Either way, doesn’t look good for them.