Endless Black and Brown Fatigue
I think anyone can do a really quick analysis of which “refugees” from which ethnic backgrounds commit the most crimes. For example, Hong Kong refugees being non-white Europeans did not start sexually assaulting women in England within weeks of arriving. There were no campaign to kick them out. But the same cannot be said of the many black and brown so-called refugees from Islamic countries. The British public would have had a completely different view of the white European refugees like Ukrainians if they were coming here and in majority committing crimes while there wasn’t actually a war going on back home.
Why are you not questioning the fact that no Asian, Middle Eastern, or African country is giving refuge to their fellow neighbours in need? Or reverse the roles, why hasn’t any Asian or African country offered refuge to Ukrainians in this time of war apart from Japan? Why is there an expectation on the Europeans to give refuge to the whole world only then for them to be spat upon in return? Black and Brown people like yourself form ethnic solidarity groups all over the West, so don’t be surprised if you start seeing a counter to that as you start overdoing it from ethnically white groups. He is basically in Western Europe and advocating for those outside this sphere and wondering why there is a pushback to his narrative.
And, the whole of Western Europe, has been under a common Christian cultural influence for long enough to unite them because of it. They had been dealing with each other for centuries, as friends, as enemies, and then as friends again. They have a shared history. The same is for Africans and Asians. People like him really should be more concerned about why African countries don’t help each other out more, and why Asian countries don’t help each other out more, and instead come begging to Europe for alms. And if that care is genuine then these people should move to their ethnic homelands to help them be better.
And, Shabana Mahmood’s policies are a hoax anyway. It is all a farce. The policy is not there to fix an immigration system but rather to legalise illegal migration of her cousins and extended family.
“My goal is to ensure there are legal routes into this country for those who are truly fleeing peril, and for whom this is the first safe country they have encountered.”
She says somewhat correctly over here what needs to be done although doesn’t go further. Refugee routes should only be open to genuine refugees and they should be processed through Britain overseas embassies rather than here in the country when they are already here. But that should be in normal circumstances. We need a complete and utter stop for now. It actually should only be limited to countries we have a treaty with because of some mutual benefit or if they are of similar cultural backgrounds like any country from the Anglosphere or Europe. Otherwise, there shouldn’t be any reason for it. And the second proviso needs to be the strongest, if we are the first safe country. To be honest, if that were to be the first condition then we would only be providing refuge to the fish.
But she betrays herself and the entire nation in what she writes in the following paragraph:
“As we restore control to our borders, I will therefore open new, capped, safe and legal routes for genuine refugees. While these will be modest at first, they will grow in time.
Crucially, they will make community sponsorship the norm for the resettlement of refugees. Community and voluntary organisations will be able to sponsor refugees to come to the UK and support them when they arrive. This will ensure that communities that have the capacity and desire to accept refugees will be able to do so. As the Homes for Ukraine scheme shows, the British people’s capacity for this generosity is deep.
At the same time, we will open new legal routes for students and those in work. We will ensure war doesn’t cut short their chances in life, and we will welcome those here who can contribute to our national life. While refugee status for those who come here will be temporary, those who come via legal routes will have a faster and easier path to becoming permanent citizens.”
This is just a scheme to legalise illegal migrants, maybe get rid of the extreme undesirables in the process, but keep the gates flowing till the demographic change has been accomplished. And this is also a very shrewd political move in a way, to show Greens and Lib Dems, as been unhinged and against the will of the public, and get some momentum back from them, some members back from them into Labour. While nothing of any important will be delivered.
This is going to be such a shit show. I need to order a truck load of popcorns and new steel reinforced doors and probably build a moot. For what is to come will be entertaining on some levels, tragic on many levels, and dangerous on all levels.
Oh good stuff! Momus I thought you had given up on political crap ?
I certainly could not come even close to summarising the recent Parliament clown show as well as that.
No one should believe any of it.
Any apparent concessions to common sense are illusions or cheap give aways.
The idea to is counter the growing disquiet which is starting to filter through even to the 'head in the sand normies".
The left want all the bloody third world to live in Britain. That is what a no borders policy means. Not one of these useful idiots even consider that a cap on numbers should at least be set.
How many million imported extra foreigners will be enough to assuage their ridiculous concept of white guilt?
Minor questions arise should arise to anyone with half a brain.
Where will they live, will they be able to eat and who pays ?
To me the whole farce in yesterdays speech and debate was symbolic of what this country has now become :
A Pakistani woman arguing with an African woman over what immigration should be allowed into Britain - in our own Parliament.
It shows what has happened in the last 77 years since the Windrush docked.
That is all within the lifetime of many many old folk and not far back beyond my own lifespan.
No one under fifty seems really bothered about it though.
It is the Britain they grew up in.
Well they are welcome to it.
I knew this country when it still had some pride in itself and was a far far better place to live in.
If only my children and grandchildren would emigrate out of this shit heap I could die happy.
After I am gone do what you like with the UK.
Only old video footage, black and white photographs and the English names on gravestones will tell of a "Civilsation gone with wind".