I refuse to go gently into the night !
There is a reason why I have been calling them Muslim Rape Gangs as everyone should as well. Even calling them Pakistani Rape Gangs is not precise and/or Labour Enable or whatever gangs. Language is important. This is how narratives are shaped and changed, and discourse is diverted.
These are Muslim Rape Gangs because Islam allows it and sanctions it for the worst people in their culture to act in the most heinous of ways. And it doesn't matter if most are peaceful and decent who don't do such things. What matters is that the base code of this bad coded ideology has allowances for it in different forms that can be manipulated.
When we call them Grooming Gangs, it allows them to put them on the same level as other horrific yet not religiously and ethnically motivated, paedophilic rings. When you call them Pakistani Rape Gangs, it only narrows it down to Pakistanis and not to Syrians, Gazans, Iraqis, Somalians, Egyptians etc etc Rape Gangs that are going on all across Europe in collaboration with each other.
When you call them Muslim Rape Gangs that is when you are precise. This is what breaks their narrative of the myth of decent moderate Muslims being the norm and not the oddity within that culture. This breaks their narrative myth that a version of Islam can coexist with the West. That oh look at UAE and Saudi currently. They don't have such crimes. What they have is temporary peace and order, wait for something bad to happen to their levels of prosperity or change of leadership, and see how they will all return to their core teaching. Because it is a bad coding problem.
I am here to tell you this, and I will keep banging about it. Islam does not belong in the West. There are no good Muslims, there are good people who remain good people by being bad Muslims. By not following their religion how they are supposed to do it. And their moderation does not guarantee the moderation of their future generations when the source material remains corrupt. And the fundamentals will remain corrupt as it is a bad coding issue within Islam.
So, I do not want to hear about your moderate Muslim friends. I do not want to sacrifice the British people on that liberal alter of race relations and religion of peace campaign malarkey. If it means I am hated by the champagne party class then so be it. I have no desire to rub shoulders with intellectual and spiritual cowards. If it gets me more hateful messages and threats, I don't care, I am already used to it over the years. Whatever be the consequences. The truth needs to be said and upheld. I will keep on doing that as I always have done so.
My knowledge of Islam is rudimentary but I have read the Qur'an and am now reading Robert Spencer's 'Critical Qur'an' with footnotes which cites explanation and cross references from Hadith sources by historically respected Islamic scholars. I see the regular articles on world wide 'Jihad' topics on Jihadwatch. org. I admit this does not make me an expert - but perhaps as a non Muslim I am better informed than most ?
We are continually told that there are 'moderate' Muslims and as you suggest Momus, these folk seem indeed to be Muslims who do not practice their faith as it is written. That in fact they are 'bad' in those terms and can be, and are, called to stricter conformity by fundamental Islamists.
I would like to see this question asked to a room full of Muslims :
"Do you believe that the Qur'an is a written account of the literal and actual words of Allah, as transmitted to the Prophet by the Angel Gabriel - and that nothing in it can be changed, challenged or ignored?
Would any 'moderate' Muslim in the room stand up and denounce this statement ?
For this is in my opinion the crux of the whole thing.
And for those non believers with Muslim friends try asking them directly if the Qur'an allows them to take non believers as 'friends'