They love Mexico so much that they are willing to go to war with American authorities in America so that they don't get deported to their beloved Mexico.
What is happening right now in Los Angeles was somewhat predictable. So, I am slightly surprised that Trump administration wasn’t better prepared for it. Or maybe this is something they wanted so they can justify their current administration and guarantee it for the next elections.
Why I say this was predictable is because of the approach chosen. Reversal of migration needs a layered approach as been saying for a while now. Remove the easy layers in a slow and incremental way till you have whittled it down to its least denominator. Then it makes it easier and manageable to deal with the core issues.
Also, along the way, it gives you time to change and adapt your approach, and develop better understanding of the problem so you can put things in place to stop it from reoccurring.
All of a sudden results in all of a sudden violence and chaos. Unless you are prepared for it, it is not advisable. It can wreck the very fabric of your country, and the end result might be worst than the desired outcome.
Now, it can be argued that America or the wider West, clearly doesn’t have enough time to do thing slowly and incrementally. I am somewhat in agreement of that and I contradict my earlier point and disagree with it slightly. My earlier point stands if these measures as I have been saying for years had started few years ago or there was a way of guaranteeing the policies would carry on in years to come. But as soon as there is a political party change you will not be able to guarantee it. Especially if you see how the Democrats are reacting to it and how the governor of California is reacting to it himself.
Obviously, my incremental layered approach, would be more applicable in Britain, where the makeup of the society is different and the chances of violence outburst although present but are easy to manage. (Edit: A localised chaos of violence is easier to manage when you have the majority population on your side as a government - compared to the chaos of violence that can erupt when the majority population and the government are at odds, and the sectarian groups take advantage.)
Because of the size of the country, and geography of trouble making demographics which can be cordoned off, and the lack of lethal weapons with the wider social circulation. Although, when such policies start happening here, we will see civil unrest no doubt. It will be chaotic and it will be dangerous, but not as much as the potential for them to be in America.
So, what is the point? The point that after this display of violence, and I believe it will continue and it will spread to other Democratic controlled states, the result if handled correctly would be the destruction of the political left derangement policies. This will be a sudden shock, and it needs to be controlled and managed. Although it doesn’t have the fuel to continue beyond the summer.
After that will start the proper process of mass deportations and remigration policies, and all of this will actually give it legitimacy. And when those policies actually start being implement it will have to be a layered approach.
So, what does the layered approach look like in Britain?
Easy wins:
Apply the Great Repeal Act, and repeal all of anti British laws like Human Rights Act and leave all international conventions that are against British interests like the ECHR
Fast track processing and deportations of all illegal migrants
Taking away incentives - no benefits for non-citizens - no being housed in hotels but instead temporary tents
Complete halt of all migration - complete halt of issuing citizenships to anyone
Deportations of all criminals - dual citizens and foreign criminals
Any migrant below a certain financial threshold to be deported - increase that threshold to average income
Deportations of all family members of all international students here as dependents unless on higher research grants - disallow dependent visas
Stop the automatic citizen as a birthright.
Ban halal and kosher meat - both the sale and importation of it
This is the first layer of the layered approach. And then in the second layer you offer incentives for people to voluntarily leave and rebuke their British citizenships in the process voluntarily. I would say this could also be British natives who hate Britain, they can leave and never return and stop enabling the destruction of the country.
After that you would find the remaining problem to be a lot less and easier to manage. Doing everything at once would be an administrative impossibility, and it might lead in destructive failures which could vanish the appetite in a somewhat docile British public. It took a long time to screw up this country and it would take a long time to unscrew it if the job is to be done properly.
Yes good.
Just a few observations.
You concede now that we do not have the luxury of time to fix this .
Your list of Easy wins - all achievable but who has the will to enact them?
Look at Rupert Lowe and Halal meat. Look at the Burka issue. Lone voices against the tide.
Part of the problem is ' the somewhat docile British public".
You echo a speech by Enoch Powell about the "strange passivity of the English in the face of danger, absurdity or provocation"
Sheep waiting stupidly for the throats to be cut. Back to Halal meat again.
I take big issue with you on " the chaos of violence [sic in the UK] though present are easy to manage"
Totally wrong. There are no forces strong enough to manage riots outside London.
Even there only for a very limited time.
Simultaneous riots in cities could go on for weeks.
The end result is the Utopia equality society the leftists seek - as in LA.
The control of society in the hands of sectarian and criminal mobs.
That is until Islam introduces it's own brand of rule.
For me today the only ray of hope is the yesterdays event in Ballymena.
The police ineffective and the people who have had enough of immigrant depredations.