They love Mexico so much that they are willing to go to war with American authorities in America so that they don't get deported to their beloved Mexico.
You must understand that there are still limits to what a non-anonymous account who is still in employment can openly endorse and cannot endorse. That doesn't mean I am limited or censored as you know well that I am not, it just means that you have to be tactful to play the long game.
Even aside from that what happened in Ballymena is a thing that I cannot endorse and is probably the kind of thing that I wish our government to avoid by not ignoring their concerns and acting upon them. May the best mob win is a pathway to destruction, a violent revolution without a head or a purpose. Not something I can endorse or desire. I have lived through much violence and civil unrest in my life to not fantasize about such things. But obviously doesn't mean that it is not inevitable if we continue down this path, just that my efforts are to avoid it while not compromising the desired outcomes. As always, hope for the best but prepare for the worst, doesn't mean you should wish for the worst.
A localised chaos of violence is easier to manage when you have the majority population on your side as a government - compared to the chaos of violence that can erupt when the majority population and the government are at odds, and the sectarian groups take advantage. - this is what I meant and will put it down as an edit.
i respect your position and have slightly edited my post with that in mind.
I feel the crux of the matter is consent.
Consent to be ruled by Government, consent to obey law and consent to be policed.
Particularly the consent to be policed which in the UK has been long the case for the native population. Incoming foreigners have been shown in many cases not to buy into that. Result is two tier policing.
The Government have placed the police on a knife edge.
Police can only operate with the majority consent of decent law abiding people.
More and more folk are now disenchanted with the police, they are being openly challenged and ridiculed. This will only increase into widespread non compliance.
Individual officers will have to decide what side they are on. And the police having backing the wrong side for decades.
Yes good.
Just a few observations.
You concede now that we do not have the luxury of time to fix this .
Your list of Easy wins - all achievable but who has the will to enact them?
Look at Rupert Lowe and Halal meat. Look at the Burka issue. Lone voices against the tide.
Part of the problem is ' the somewhat docile British public".
You echo a speech by Enoch Powell about the "strange passivity of the English in the face of danger, absurdity or provocation"
Sheep waiting stupidly for the throats to be cut. Back to Halal meat again.
I take big issue with you on " the chaos of violence [sic in the UK] though present are easy to manage"
Totally wrong. There are no forces strong enough to manage riots outside London.
Even there only for a very limited time.
Simultaneous riots in cities could go on for weeks.
The end result is the Utopia equality society the leftists seek - as in LA.
The control of society in the hands of sectarian and criminal mobs.
That is until Islam introduces it's own brand of rule.
For me today the only ray of hope is the yesterdays event in Ballymena.
The police ineffective and the people who have had enough of immigrant depredations.
You must understand that there are still limits to what a non-anonymous account who is still in employment can openly endorse and cannot endorse. That doesn't mean I am limited or censored as you know well that I am not, it just means that you have to be tactful to play the long game.
Even aside from that what happened in Ballymena is a thing that I cannot endorse and is probably the kind of thing that I wish our government to avoid by not ignoring their concerns and acting upon them. May the best mob win is a pathway to destruction, a violent revolution without a head or a purpose. Not something I can endorse or desire. I have lived through much violence and civil unrest in my life to not fantasize about such things. But obviously doesn't mean that it is not inevitable if we continue down this path, just that my efforts are to avoid it while not compromising the desired outcomes. As always, hope for the best but prepare for the worst, doesn't mean you should wish for the worst.
A localised chaos of violence is easier to manage when you have the majority population on your side as a government - compared to the chaos of violence that can erupt when the majority population and the government are at odds, and the sectarian groups take advantage. - this is what I meant and will put it down as an edit.
i respect your position and have slightly edited my post with that in mind.
I feel the crux of the matter is consent.
Consent to be ruled by Government, consent to obey law and consent to be policed.
Particularly the consent to be policed which in the UK has been long the case for the native population. Incoming foreigners have been shown in many cases not to buy into that. Result is two tier policing.
The Government have placed the police on a knife edge.
Police can only operate with the majority consent of decent law abiding people.
More and more folk are now disenchanted with the police, they are being openly challenged and ridiculed. This will only increase into widespread non compliance.
Individual officers will have to decide what side they are on. And the police having backing the wrong side for decades.
They live in communities.
A precarious position.